The Century has Turned, What Have we Learned? Asbestos in 1901

We are now into 1901 for our history review through the Minerals Yearbook. The scientists finally have capitulated to market forces that two distinct minerals will be mined and sold using the name “asbestos:” amphiboles and chrysotile. So, it is no longer “asbestos” versus “chrysotile” but, rather, it is “amphiboles” versus “chrysotile,” both of which are a form of asbestos. They are similar in physical properties, although chrysotile is superior in strength and elasticity.

Here is an interesting fact. Fibers of amphiboles can be extremely long, running up to three feet in length. I had not heard that from any other historical source.

At that time amphibole asbestos fibers were more easily found in the United States than were chrysotile fibers. Chrysotile files were generally imported from Canada.

Vermont was getting a big name in asbestos mining.

The relationship between talc and asbestos was starting to be well known.

New uses for asbestos fibers were growing exponentially.

Demand and imports were growing to meet the new product requirements.

Interesting trip down memory lane. Should you have any questions or comments, please either leave a comment or email me at TheAsbestosBlog@gmail.com. Marty